Terence Atmane vs Adam Walton Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing second serve performance, Walton has secured 46.43% of points over the past six months, compared to Atmane's 48.53%. These percentages carry a notable correlation to predicting match outcomes. Meanwhile, tackling return game statistics, Walton has recently achieved a 47.09% success rate in gaining points from opponents' second serves, surpassing Atmane's figure of 45.58%. In terms of first serve returns, Walton leads slightly with 24.19%, while Atmane follows closely at 23.27%. Both these metrics are instrumental in forecasting the outcome of their head-to-head matchups.

When discussing performance under pressure, Walton has saved 55.21% of breakpoints in recent play, while Atmane demonstrates greater resilience by saving 60%—a crucial factor for strategic in-game betting. Regarding match victories in the past year, Walton emerges with a winning rate of 59.09% as opposed to Atmane's 51.47%. This provides a solid foundation for making head-to-head predictions. On examining surface-specific success, Walton has excelled on hard courts with a career win rate of 68%; concurrently, Atmane has accomplished a 65% win rate on the same surface. Walton's performance on clay (38% win rate) is notably challenged, just as Atmane experiences limitations on grass with a 33% win rate.

In terms of the competitive level, Walton achieved a triumph rate of 70.83% in Challenger/ITF tournaments over $10K, whereas Atmane managed 53.85% in a similar category. Such statistics demonstrate the importance of comparing players relative to their respective event levels. Historically, in their head-to-head encounters, Atmane holds the upper hand, having won one out of one match, with a 2-1 set advantage over Walton. Their last confrontation took place at the Shanghai Rolex Masters, where Atmane emerged triumphant, securing a 6-7(4), 6-4, 6-4 win.

Concerning deciding sets, Walton has undergone such situations 60% of the time over the past year, signifying a higher likelihood of clinching victories in crucial moments compared to Atmane's 42% success rate. The intense pressure of tiebreaks has seen Walton victorious in one occurrence, while Atmane is yet to triumph. When considering the caliber of opponents, Walton has faced players with an average rank of 203.65 over the last year, a slightly tougher lineup than Atmane's opponents, who averaged a ranking of 218.46.

Furthermore, Walton has showcased a slightly better conversion of breakpoints, achieving a 31.96% conversion rate compared to Atmane’s 30.53%. Given all these statistical insights and current performances, Walton's slight statistical advantages indicate a higher probability of emerging victorious in their approaching clash.